Fake Houston Attorney Mark Bennett

I submitted a blog post by Houston, Texas Attorney Mark Bennett into the Dr. Nerve's Markov Page, which states that "the page allows the writer to type in prose or poetry, and submit it to a Markov Chain engine. This engine munches through the writer's text, performs a statistical analysis, and spits out statistically similar text." The following is what the output result was from a random selection of his writing:

"I don’t need to prove that such was not only am I don’t need to prove that such was not only am I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to prove that I’m opposed to prove that I’m opposed to all of the verb “to create doubt in a proposition by insisting upon it.”) I would hate to prove that I oppose murder, and for coining the other bad things. (I want Urban Dictionary credit for coining the verb “to gertrude,” meaning “to gertrude,” meaning “to gertrude,” meaning “to gertrude,” meaning “to gertrude,” meaning “to create doubt in a proposition by insisting upon it.”) I don’t need to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious. I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to all of the verb “to create doubt in a proposition by insisting upon it.”) I don’t need to prove that I oppose all the case. So, once and rape, and rape, and revenge porn, and rape, and for all, not only am I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to prove that I need to prove that I don’t need to have to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious that I opposed to prove that such was not only am I don’t need to prove it. And furthermore I need to prove that such was not the bad things. It goes without saying. And nobody would never say that I would hate to have to prove it. And furthermore I oppose all of the case. So, once and rape, and all of the case. So, once and all of the bad things. (I want Urban Dictionary credit for all, not only am I oppose murder, and rape, and rape, and for all, not only am I would never say that I hope it’s obvious. I oppose all of the case. So, once and revenge porn, and for coining the other bad things. (I want Urban Dictionary credit for coining the bad things unless I don’t need to have to have to prove that I hope it’s obvious. I would hate to prove that I don’t need to prove that I would never say that I opposed to prove that I’m opposed to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious that I hope it’s obvious. I oppose murder, and all of the other bad things. It goes without saying. And nobody would suggest that I proactively insisted that such was not only am I hope it’s obvious. I need to prove that I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to have to prove that I proactively insisted that such was not only am I don’t need to prove that I need to prove that. I don’t need to prove that. I need to have to prove that I would suggest that I hope it’s obvious. I don’t need to prove that I’m opposed to prove that I need to prove that I need to prove that I don’t need to prove it. And furthermore I don’t need to prove that such was not only am I don’t need to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious. I don’t need to all the verb “to gertrude,” meaning “to gertrude,” meaning “to create doubt in a proposition by insisting upon it.”) I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious. I don’t need to prove that I need to prove that I don’t need to prove that. I need to prove that. I oppose all of the other bad things. (I want Urban Dictionary credit for coining the other bad things, but also I need to prove that I’m opposed to prove that I need to all of the other bad things, but also I hope it’s obvious. I don’t need to prove that I would hate to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious that I opposed to prove that I opposed to all of the bad things. It goes without saying. And furthermore I don’t need to have to prove it. And nobody would hate to prove that I don’t need to bad things unless I proactively insisted that I don’t need to prove that I would never say that I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to prove that I opposed to prove that I don’t need to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious. I need to prove that I opposed to prove that I’m opposed to bad things unless I don’t need to prove that. I oppose all of the case. So, once and revenge porn, and rape, and for coining the case. So, once and revenge porn, and rape, and revenge porn, and for coining the bad things. (I want Urban Dictionary credit for all, not only am I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious. I don’t need to all of the other bad things unless I don’t need to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious that I don’t need to prove that I’m opposed to prove that I proactively insisted that I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to all the case. So, once and for all, not only am I need to prove that. I don’t need to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious that I don’t need to have to prove that I don’t need to have to prove that such was not the case. So, once and rape, and all of the verb “to create doubt in a proposition by insisting upon it.”) I would suggest that I don’t need to cops being murdered. Because it’s obvious that such was not only am I don’t need to prove that such was not the bad things. (I want Urban Dictionary credit for all, not the case. So, once and for coining the bad things. (I want Urban Dictionary credit for all, not the case. So, once and all of the bad things."